May Allah protect Saudi Arabia and its people.

Those who know me, know that I’m anything but a Saudi apologist, far from it. As matt of fact I’m an open critic, a very harsh one. However, I don’t make Takfir on the rulers in Saudi and believe that whoever forces (religious blackmailing with superficial Istidlalat as if it’s a clear cut matter with zero hhubuhat involved) others to do so is a complete nutcase.

If Saudi falls there will be nothing but chaos, havoc and likely a civil war. Worse, the Rafidah, with the head of the snake and Shaytan being Neo-Safawi Iran, will most likely take over. No matter how much one disagrees with the Saudis, one shouldn’t get blinded by ones opposition to them, for the principle enemy of Ahlus-Sunnah has his eyes on the true Haramayn (Makkah and Madinah) which it wants to turn into carnivalistic places of self-flagellation, mud bathing, grave worship, tomb crawling and other Persian Rafidi Majoosi paganism in the name of Ahlul-Bayt.

This doesn’t mean that we don’t speak against injustice, this means that we don’t let our lands fall into the hands of the Majus of Qom and Tehran. We don’t take a defeatist approach but we also not gonna act hastly and make things worse.

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (who criticised and refuted the Ghulāt Sūfiyyah whilst defending SHAR’ī Tasawwuf) balanced words on Tasawwuf.

He literally says that amongst the greatest Awliya` of Allah are those who were called Sufis.

والتحقيق أن فيه الممدوح والمذموم ـ يعني في مذهب التصوف الممدوح والمذموم ـ والمذموم منه ما يكون اجتهادياً ومنه غير ذلك، كفقه الرأي فإنه قد ذم فقه الرأي طوائف من الفقهاء والعلماء والعباد ” . ثم يقول : ” ومـن المتسمين بهذا الاسم ـ أي التصوف ـ من أولياء الله وصفوته وخيار عباده ما لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله، كما أن من أهل الرأي ـ أي من فقهاء الرأي ـ أهل العلم والإيمان طوائف لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله ” .

The Salaf preferred the term Zuhd instead of Tasawwuf (which has a disputed origin), however, none of them rejected the Shar’ī intended meaning and Maqāsid of it as they are and inherent part of Sunni creed.

The scholars say:

التصوف الصحيح بني على الزهد، والزهد أصل من أصول الشريعة

‘Correct and authentic Tasawwuf is based on Zuhd (Islamic ascetism) and Zuhd is a branch of the branches of the Shari’ah.’

The early Salaf used the term ‘Zuhd’ instead of Tasawwuf, the likes of ‘Abdullah Ibn al-Mubarak al-Turkumāni (181 AH, Hannad ibn al-Sari (152 AH), Imam Ahmad, etc.

The Muslim, Sunni, is just, he is moderate by nature and rejects all forms of extremism.

One of the Usūl and principles the scholars mention is:

أن العبرة في الحكم على الأشياء بالمسميات لا بالأسماء

‘The criterion for judging matters is based on their reality and not on what they are called.’

So whereas every Sunni is judged as a Muslim and non-Mubtadi’ (until proven otherwise) and every Shi’ī as a Mubtadi’, yet the opposite can be true i.e. the Dhāhir is just an indicator that can be proven wrong with the actual reality of a thing or someone’s (beliefs).

Having said that:

The one who calls himself Shi’ī, including a Twelver who doesn’t hold Kufrī beliefs and doesn’t pray to Imāms (although extremely rare) = Muslim brother in faith, however, Mubtadi’.

The ‘Sunnī’ who prays like Pīr Baba X, Y, Z and hold other Kufrī and Shirkī beliefs = Pagan Mushrik.

It’s not about Sunni or Shia and name calling, it’s about the reality of matters, it’s about Tawhīd and Shirk. So don’t be fooled by labels.

Quburi Sifat rejecters and deniers of the Jahmite kind have no issues with buried Imams, saints and pirs in their graves listening (and ming to aid) of millions upon millions of people and their duas like as if they are connected to a personal hotline with them (a 24/h one, 7 days weeks a day, as if their saints don’t sleep).

They have no issue that divine attributes, including those that are specific to Allah are attributed to the creation, but they have issues with Ahlul-Sunnah wa al-Athar affirming the Sifat in the Qur’an such as Hands, Face etc.

They have an issue with Allah speaking directly to Musa (a)!

#Tajsim #Tajseem #Jahmi #Nonsense

It’s a dog eat dog was world, it always has been.

Continue reading Yes, We Are Conquerers! →

لا إله إلا الله
‘There is no deity worthy of worship in truth except God/Allāh’ is undoubtly superior and the only truth, the only right Dīn is Islām

ولو كره المشركون

Zindiq: I’m Allah!

Sufi: MashaAllah, how elegant! There is a context to this statement you shallow minded Wahabi simpleton.

Sunni-Athari: Allah is above his ‘Arsh, bila kayf.

Sufi: A’oooooozoooobir-Rasul! Ya Ghawth al-A’dham (NOT Allah nor his Mesenger)/Ya Sidi Abdal-Qadir+Ya Ali+Ya Badawi madaaaad!

You Mujassim! Allah exist without place and time, blah blah blah blah blah…takfir takfir!