The great achievements of a fallible man – no matter how great, even if he is a Shaykh al-Islam – do not blind the Muslim or lead him to fanaticism. In the words of Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) who one day pointed towards the grave of the Final Messenger of Allah (ﷺ):
Distorting and decontextualising Qur’anic verses and sahih Sunni ahadith and often than not presenting blatant fabrications and weak Sunni narrations as ‘authentic Sunni sources’ have been the most resourceful tools in the Shia box of tricks.
A picture is worth a thousand words. This phrase is used to express that it can be easier to show something in a picture than to describe it by speaking words or using the written word. Indeed, a picture tells a story just as well as, if not better than, a lot of written words.
Typically, flogging is imposed on an unwilling subject as a punishment; however, it can also be submitted willingly for sadomasochistic pleasure, or performed on oneself, in religious or sadomasochistic contexts. This article will deal with the link between self-flagellation in Shi’ism and Christianity, particularly in Catholic societies.
From Rafidi parts in Lebanon, to the heartland of Iran, names like Abdullah, Abdul-Rahim, Abdul-Razzaq etc. are only common in Sunni regions of those respected countries, in Shia regions you can barely find such names, yet there are plenty of: Abdol-Hossein, Abdol-Reza, Abdol-Amir (Ali b. Abi Talib), Abdol-Zahra (Fatimah), Abdol-Rasul, etc. names that the Ahlul-Bayt and their students never approved.
Qassem Soleimani, aide-de-camp to Rafidi dictator Khamenei, lifesaver of secular Nusayri-Rafidi pagan Bashar la-Assad, butcher of Syrian children, has been turned into a cringe idol not long after he was turned into a Persian kabab/cutlet (kotlet) by the foolish WTF (Wilayatul-Faqih) regime.
Over the course of the last forty years, Iran has burnt tens of thousands of American and ‘Israeli’ flags, has chanted ‘Death to Israel’ and of course claims to be the flag bearer of the Palestinian cause.
- This treatise is divided into the following sections:
- The Roots of Nowruz
- Bogus claim: Nowruz is a cultural event free of any religious or superstitious connotations that oppose Islamic teachings
- Fire rituals, from Anatolia, Kurdistan to Khorasan
- Fire jumping rituals
- Nowruz according to Zoroastrianism
- The superstitious and polytheistic Haft Sin
- Nowruz Veneration by the Shia clergy
- The Twelfth Imam will emerge on the day of Nowruz
- The day routine of a Shiite on Majusi Nowruz
Omid Sharifi ‘Dana’ (he dislikes his actual Arab last name ‘Sharifi’ as he hates anything related to Arabs and the Arab language) is an infamous Shia-born convert to Zoroastrianism (common amongst Iranian born-Shias), Iranian ultra-nationalist, racist, and apologist of Shi’ism and the Iranian Khomeinist Shi’ite regime. Sounds contradicting? You will find out why there is no contradiction in that and why certain groups of Iranian ultra-nationalists have always championed and supported Shi’ism as a tool to fight Muslims and distort Islam in the name of Islam.
I can provide you with plenty of lectures, in Arabic, Persian, etc. where they idolatrous turban-heads of the Rafidah literally say that invoking the Imams/Ali ibn Abi Talib (or even Fatimah 500+ times in prostration!) for rizq, children, literally anything you wish, is the purest form of Tawhid and can never be shirk. How? Well, like other heretical Quburis they add their favourite clause/cop-out ‘with the permission of Allah’ i.e. rejecting Istiqlal (dependency from Allah) for their buried and tombed demigods.
The grave worshippers argue that their tombed demigods are depending on Allah i.e. Allah is superior to them and they are not mustaqil (independent) from Allah and they can’t do anything without His will and permission and thus they (Quburis) are not committing any form of shirk whatsoever. He (Allah) chose to give them (buried saints) these powers, which of course is nothing but a lie.
So because the Rafidah affirm with their tongues that Allah has chosen to bestow the Imams/Ahlul-Bayt with the power to hear and respond to every du’a (even if you bypass Allah and call directly on the Imams without mentioning Allah at all!), they (the Rafidah) can now totally invoke their Imams exactly like one is supposed to invoke Allah in du’a, the Rafidi just has to add the clause ‘with the permission of Allah’.
And this the result of the Istiqlal nonsense. These extremist Rawafid are monotheists, Muslims, upon the Millah of Ibrahim (i.e. Hunafa`) who (at worst) have erred according to the likes of al-‘Awni, Qadhi, etc. and according to the extremists from amongst the Sufis and the Rafidah this is the purest form of Tawhid. Enjoy their ‘Tawhid’:
Abul Fatḥ Muḥammad ibn Abdil-Kareem al-Shahrastāni (d. 548) lived some two centuries before Ibn Taimiyya (d. 728) and ibn al-Qayyim (d. 751), let alone being some seven centuries before MiAW (d. 1206). Despite that, this is what he had to say about idol-worshipers in his encyclopedic work on religions and sects ‘Al-Milal wan-Niḥal’: Continue reading Al-Shahristani on the Shirk of the Quburis (grave worshippers)
The bamboozled gullible sheep have been fooled all along…
Nahj al-Balagha (Arabic: نهج البلاغة) (the Peak of Eloquence) is a collection of sayings and writings attributed to ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضي الله عنه). It is a highly revered Twelver Shia book often referred to by Shia ‘Ayatollahs’ as the brother of the Qur’an (then they have the audacity to claim that Sunnis exaggerate with Sahih Bukhari who nobody dares to compare to the Qur’an).
Never forget: The wretched French 🇨🇵 granted exile to Khomeini+let him preach+literally escorted him to take over Iran.
In every Aqidah book, including in Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah’s (‘Nasibis’) ‘Aqeedah al-Wasitiyyah you can read the testimony of Ahlus-Sunnah with regards to their love of Ahlul-Bayt that is based on a balance i.e. they neither hate the Ahlul-Bayt (like Nawasib) nor have fallen into extremism with them (like the Rawafid), it is a middle path where the Ahlul-Bayt are given their due right, love for them is incumbent upon every Muslim and the scholars of Islam from Bukhari to the smallest Muhaddith have filled their books with chapters of the merits of the Ahlul-Bayt.
Shaykh al-Islam Abul-‘Abbas Ibn Taymiyyah denounced and refuted Rafidis AND Nasibis:
In the name of Allah, all praise is due to Allah and may the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon His final Messenger Muhammad al-Mustafa, his family and Companions, especially the Rightly Guided Caliphs, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, ‘Umar al-Faruq, ‘Uthman Dhu al-Nurayn and ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, Assadullah al-Ghalib.
Celebrating that day is an innovation (bid’ah), and making it an anniversary for mourning is an innovation.
By Ebn Hussein
Sunni-Salafi scholars have always condemned extremism (tatarruf) and exaggeration (ghuluww) that heretical sects have perpetuated, innovated and propagated in the name of (or in opposition of) the Ahlul-Bayt, peace be upon them. By pondering over the statements presented in this treatise, the non-biased reader will clearly realise that Sunnis (Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah) are the middle path between two extremes; namely the extremism of Rafidism (Imamite Shi’ism) and that of Nasibism (the Nasibah or Nawasib i.e. those who embrace the hate of Ali (r) and his family as part of their faith).
Are you aware of the famous hadith of Muadh ibn Jabal (ra) who was sent to the great people of Yemen to teach them Islam and its fundamentals?
Parading corrupt and secular leaders and kings in the Muslim/Sunni world as representatives of Sunnism is as objective as parading the secular former Shah of Iran as a beacon of Shi’ism.
What is definitely hypocritical is if one were to claim to be the flag bearer of Islam and Muslims whilst at the same time allying himself with the worst enemies of Islam against the Muslims (or at the very least preferring the Kuffar over Ahlus-Sunnah).
Visit to Khomeini’s grave:
Of course, during my stay in Iran I was also eager to visit the infamous Khomeini shrine (which even then resembled a Sassanian Zoroastrian palace rather than the modest grave of an alleged ascetic Muslim and leader of the oppressed).
That’s a fact and not up to debate. Yes, every Muslim nation has its rotten fruits/ apostates, however, the champion (when it comes to apostasy and anti-Islam sentiments) is undoubtly ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶I̶s̶l̶a̶m̶i̶c̶ ̶R̶e̶p̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶ ̶o̶f̶ Shia Iran. Three Ex-Muslim councils in three major European countries alone are founded by Shia born Iranian.
Left: Zionist military leader Mosha Dayan in occupied Jerusalem 1976 Right: Qasem Soleimani in Aleppo 2016. History repeated itself on that day. The principle enemies of Islam, the Neo-Sasanian Majus (under the guise of Shi’ism) have shown once again their true face.
Yes, sometimes falsehood does deserve mocking, however, mocking alone will bring no good, at the very least it must be accompanied by knowledge.
The Rafidi practice of praying on the dirt/soil of the grave (!) of al-Husayn (r) in Karbala is nothing but a ugly Bid’ah that was concocted by extremists in the name of the Ahlul-Bayt that has been academically refuted for the falsehood that it is.
لعنة الله على كسرى المجوس هذا الزمان #الشجرة_الملعونة
A young Palestinian student of mine said to me: “Ustadh, I’ve this Shia boy in my class, he said today is Muslim new year. I thought he meant Hijri new year (even that’s a bid’a to celebrate), but his friend told him about Nowruz in the Shia mosque!
It’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for Grand Ayatollah Sistani (Ayatollah=sign/miracle of God) to recite the Qur’an with basic Tajwid…
Persianised and whitewashed depections (often strangely effaminate) of the Ahlul-Bayt are widespread in Shia regions of Iran and Iraq and elswhere for a reason. It is not just some ‘cultural practice’ that is shunned by Shia scholars, on the contrary, the Shia scholars have sanctified Catholic-esque iconography and saint depiction with their lax views regarding the depiction of human beings, particularly saints.
By Dawud Walid
Back then 25 years young, March 2009, somewhere near Green Street, East LND. My debut vid on YouTube with my friend and Shaykh, Abū Muntasir al-Balūshī (Ahlus-Sunnah Irān).
Full clip: https://youtu.be/yT0Banv3LwY
The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم)
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear Turbans in different colours (including Black, White and yellow). He never restricted himself to one colour as the Ahlul-Bid’ah and Zandaqa do (with the Rafidah being the worst of all, as they have turned it into a clerical-tyoe attire like in the Catholic Church where only clergymen wear certain clothing!)
– Although the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) did wear clothes in different colours (including Turbans) his favourite colour and what he commonly wore and advised others to wear was white:
Ibn ‘Abbas (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) said: “Wear white clothes as they are from the best of your clothes, and enshroud your dead in them.” [Abu Dawood, At-Tirmithi and Ibn Majah]
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear his turban with at least one tail, often two. Yes, there are incidents when he wore a Turban without its tale but these were rare and mainly during warfare.
– They have innovated an ugly Hindu-Caste system like Bid’ah of designating certain colours (and cleft attire!) for certain groups only:
So called ‘Sayyids’ (descendants of the Prophet, many of them are non-Arabs to the bilones with no family tree and often despise the Arabs), their laymen, can wear large green shawls (like the followers of Dajjal who will emerge from the heart of modern day Majoosi Iran), green kufis or black ones, the non-Sayyids are not supposed to wear religious attire in green or black!
As for their clergy:
Black is designated for “Sayyids” only whereas white is for non-Sayyids. This despicable Bid’ah itself is less than 500 years old and appeared after the rise of the Safavid Empire (that enforced Twelver Shi’ism on most Iranians). Imagine, even the heretical Pre-Safavid Rawafid didn’t fall into this Church-Hierarchy-style Bid’ah!
– The Rafida wear their turbans like Sikhs do i.e. without tales, yes some of their scholars do let the tale of their turban hang during prayers only but this itself is a Bid’ah (to restrict it to Salah only) and it doesn’t change the fact that the default style of theirs is to wear without letting the tale hang (like Sikh Mushriks).
A fabricated narration Shias love to use and circulate in defence of Mut’ah (pleasure / temporary marriage):
Qubūri Shubuhāt (doubts, misleading arguments) – Weaker Than a Spider Web – #CallingOtherThanAllah
Anybody who calls upon saints from afar believes by NECASSITY that his buried saints can hear, see etc everything. This person has knowingly or unknowingly deified his saints.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
‘Prostration is of two types: prostration by way of pure worship, and prostration by way of honouring and greeting showing respect. As for the former, it can only be done for Allah.’
[Majmu‘ al-Fatawa (4/361)]
We SEIZED them unawares, and lo! they were dumbfounded. – Qur’an 6:44
#Iraq #Iran #Khomeinists #Shirazis #TurbansOfIblis
One of the many objectives of Shari’ah (Islamic Law) is to safeguard the concept of Tawhid (belief in the Oneness of Allah and that none but Him is worthy of worship/ monotheism) against misuse and to direct all mankind towards worshipping and serving Allah Alone, the very purpose for which they were created. So just because something is not shirk per se, doesn’t make it right or Islamic.