Category Archives: Shi’ism & Iran

‘Ayatollah’ Brujerdi’s Startling Admission: Shi’ism’s Decline in Iran

‘Ayatollah’ Javad Alavi Boroujerdi, the grandson of the ‘Grand Ayatollah’ Hossein Tabatabaei Boroujerdi, shares concerns about the future of the Shia clergy and Shi’ism. Likewise, individuals such as Abbas Abdi, who played a role in the U.S. Embassy hostage crisis before becoming a political dissenter, and Mohsen Hashemi, the son of the son of  ‘Ayatollah’ Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, express similar apprehensions. All three are troubled by the erosion of the foundations of the Shia faith in Iran.

The May 9 edition of the Iran News examines religious leaders’ frustration with the decline of Shi’iam in Iran.

Judeo-Shiite Grave Worship VS Umar Ibn al-Khattab – The Tomb of Daniel In Iran

The great achievements of a fallible man – no matter how great, even if he is a Shaykh al-Islam – do not blind the Muslim or lead him to fanaticism. In the words of Imam Malik (may Allah have mercy on him) who one day pointed towards the grave of the Final Messenger of Allah ():

Continue reading Judeo-Shiite Grave Worship VS Umar Ibn al-Khattab – The Tomb of Daniel In Iran

Peshawar Nights – An Iranian Shia Forgery

By Ebn Hussein | 1443 / 2022

Distorting and decontextualising Qur’anic verses and sahih Sunni ahadith and often than not presenting blatant fabrications and weak Sunni narrations as ‘authentic Sunni sources’ have been the most resourceful tools in the Shia box of tricks.

Continue reading Peshawar Nights – An Iranian Shia Forgery

The Origin Of Shia Self-Flagellation Rituals: Paganism

Typically, flogging is imposed on an unwilling subject as a punishment; however, it can also be submitted willingly for sadomasochistic pleasure, or performed on oneself, in religious or sadomasochistic contexts. This article will deal with the link between self-flagellation in Shi’ism and Christianity, particularly in Catholic societies.

Continue reading The Origin Of Shia Self-Flagellation Rituals: Paganism

A Culture of Shirk – ‘Ya Ali’ Instead of ‘Salam’

A common scenary in ‘Islamic’ Iran: Shi’ites setting up altars with candles and images (Persianised and effaminite depictions of the Ahlul-Bayt) just like the polytheistic Catholics.

From Rafidi parts in Lebanon, to the heartland of Iran, names like Abdullah, Abdul-Rahim, Abdul-Razzaq etc. are only common in Sunni regions of those respected countries, in Shia regions you can barely find such names, yet there are plenty of: Abdol-Hossein, Abdol-Reza, Abdol-Amir (Ali b. Abi Talib), Abdol-Zahra (Fatimah), Abdol-Rasul, etc. names that the Ahlul-Bayt and their students never approved.

Continue reading A Culture of Shirk – ‘Ya Ali’ Instead of ‘Salam’

Idolatry In Process: Iran’s Qassem (Kotlet) Soleimani

Qassem Soleimani, aide-de-camp to Rafidi dictator Khamenei, lifesaver of secular Nusayri-Rafidi pagan Bashar la-Assad, butcher of Syrian children, has been turned into a cringe idol not long after he was turned into a Persian kabab/cutlet (kotlet) by the foolish WTF (Wilayatul-Faqih) regime.

Continue reading Idolatry In Process: Iran’s Qassem (Kotlet) Soleimani

Nowruz veneration in Shi’ism | Majusification 🔥 of Ahlul-Bayt

    This treatise is divided into the following sections:
  • The Roots of Nowruz
  • Bogus claim: Nowruz is a cultural event free of any religious or superstitious connotations that oppose Islamic teachings
  • Fire rituals, from Anatolia, Kurdistan to Khorasan
  • Fire jumping rituals
  • Nowruz according to Zoroastrianism
  • The superstitious and polytheistic Haft Sin
  • Nowruz Veneration by the Shia clergy
  • The Twelfth Imam will emerge on the day of Nowruz
  • The day routine of a Shiite on Majusi Nowruz

Continue reading Nowruz veneration in Shi’ism | Majusification 🔥 of Ahlul-Bayt

A Sinister Alliance: Iranian Supremacy And Shi’ism – A case study (Omid Dana)

Omid Sharifi ‘Dana’ (he dislikes his actual Arab last name ‘Sharifi’ as he hates anything related to Arabs and the Arab language) is an infamous Shia-born convert to Zoroastrianism (common amongst Iranian born-Shias), Iranian ultra-nationalist, racist, and apologist of Shi’ism and the Iranian Khomeinist Shi’ite regime. Sounds contradicting? You will find out why there is no contradiction in that and why certain groups of Iranian ultra-nationalists have always championed and supported Shi’ism as a tool to fight Muslims and distort Islam in the name of Islam.

Continue reading A Sinister Alliance: Iranian Supremacy And Shi’ism – A case study (Omid Dana)

‘Abdul-Hussain VS ‘Abdul-Massih

I introduce to you:
‘Abdul-Masih the Copt and ‘Abdul-Hussain (and all those who are upon his Quburi creed of invoking the buried and tombed ones).
As for the ‘Abdul-Hussain and his friends:
Yes, they literally invoke their buried and tombed demigods just like Muslims invoke Allah. They literally pray to them (directly) like Catholics pray to their saints. They ask them for all their needs (hajat), often than not they even bypasses Allah (who isn’t even worth a mention in their most famous invocations such as ‘ya ‘Ali madad’).

Continue reading ‘Abdul-Hussain VS ‘Abdul-Massih

THE CLERICAL GARB OF THE RAFIDAH – A BID’AH TAKEN FROM THE POLYTHEISTS

The worst bid’ah with regards to clothing is that of the Rafidah (and some Sufis) who have institutionalised the hideous bid’ah of clerical attire that is literally designated for a specific class of society i.e. the clergy.
This is an ugly bid’ah taken from other polytheists (Church, etc.) and started during the Safavid take-over of Persia (when modern-day Iran was forced from a majority Sunni country into a majority Rafidi Shia one) and is ever since an essential part of their religious institutions (‘scientific seminaries/al-Hawzat al-‘Ilmiyyah’) and those who graduate from them (or are given the ‘blessing’ of wearing the Rafidi turban by one of their scholars).

Continue reading THE CLERICAL GARB OF THE RAFIDAH – A BID’AH TAKEN FROM THE POLYTHEISTS

Unbelievable Shia Tawhid (Talhid) Explained by an ‘Ayatollah’ [VIDEO]

For those who don’t know, the Rafidah are on the exact same ‘Aqidah as al-‘Awni, Qadhi, and other Shirk-apologists when it comes to the issue of Istiqlal.

I can provide you with plenty of lectures, in Arabic, Persian, etc. where they idolatrous turban-heads of the Rafidah literally say that invoking the Imams/Ali ibn Abi Talib (or even Fatimah 500+ times in prostration!) for rizq, children, literally anything you wish, is the purest form of Tawhid and can never be shirk. How? Well, like other heretical Quburis they add their favourite clause/cop-out  ‘with the permission of Allah’ i.e. rejecting Istiqlal (dependency from Allah) for their buried and tombed demigods.

The grave worshippers argue that their tombed demigods are depending on Allah i.e. Allah is superior to them and they are not mustaqil (independent) from Allah and they can’t do anything without His will and permission and thus they (Quburis) are not committing any form of shirk whatsoever. He (Allah) chose to give them (buried saints) these powers, which of course is nothing but a lie.

So because the Rafidah affirm with their tongues that Allah has chosen to bestow the Imams/Ahlul-Bayt with the power to hear and respond to every du’a (even if you bypass Allah and call directly on the Imams without mentioning Allah at all!), they (the Rafidah) can now totally invoke their Imams exactly like one is supposed to invoke Allah in du’a, the Rafidi just has to add the clause ‘with the permission of Allah’.

And this the result of the Istiqlal nonsense. These extremist Rawafid are monotheists, Muslims, upon the Millah of Ibrahim (i.e. Hunafa`) who (at worst) have erred according to the likes of al-‘Awni, Qadhi, etc. and according to the extremists from amongst the Sufis and the Rafidah this is the purest form of Tawhid. Enjoy their ‘Tawhid’:

Sunni Iranians with the son of the lion of Pakistan: Ehsan Elahi Zaheer

Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (Urdu: احسان الہی ظہیر) (31 May 1945 – 30 March 1987). He hails Sialkot and was born into a deeply religious trading Punjabi family of the Sethi clan. Shaykh Ehsan was a polyglot and fluent in Urdu, Punjabi, Arabic, and Persian. He studied under many students, most importantly Shaykh Ibn Baz.

In 2012, Shaykh Ibtisam Elahi Zaheer, the son of the lion of Islam and Ahlus-Sunnah of Pakistan, Ehsan Elahi Zaheer (may Allah have mercy upon him), visited us in London, UK, in our modest studio (Toweed TV, formerly known as Wesal Farsi TV).

Continue reading Sunni Iranians with the son of the lion of Pakistan: Ehsan Elahi Zaheer

Al-Shahristani on the Shirk of the Quburis (grave worshippers)

Abul Fatḥ Muḥammad ibn Abdil-Kareem al-Shahrastāni (d. 548) lived some two centuries before Ibn Taimiyya (d. 728) and ibn al-Qayyim (d. 751), let alone being some seven centuries before MiAW (d. 1206). Despite that, this is what he had to say about idol-worshipers in his encyclopedic work on religions and sects ‘Al-Milal wan-Niḥal’: Continue reading Al-Shahristani on the Shirk of the Quburis (grave worshippers)

Ex-Shia On The Pros and Cons Of Nahj al-Balagha

Nahj al-Balagha (Arabic: نهج البلاغة) (the Peak of Eloquence) is a collection of sayings and writings attributed to ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضي الله عنه). It is a highly revered Twelver Shia book often referred to by Shia ‘Ayatollahs’ as the brother of the Qur’an (then they have the audacity to claim that Sunnis exaggerate with Sahih Bukhari who nobody dares to compare to the Qur’an).

Continue reading Ex-Shia On The Pros and Cons Of Nahj al-Balagha

Omid Safi – The esoteric (batini) Shia-Sufi Insults Sunnis!

Read between the lines, it’s neither difficult nor conspiracy BS.  ‘Ahlul-Bayt loving Sunni Islam’. As if Sunni Islam’ by definition does not teach the love of Ahlul-Bayt!

In every Aqidah book, including in Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah’s (‘Nasibis’) ‘Aqeedah al-Wasitiyyah you can read the testimony of Ahlus-Sunnah with regards to their love of Ahlul-Bayt that is based on a balance i.e. they neither hate the Ahlul-Bayt (like Nawasib) nor have fallen into extremism with them (like the Rawafid), it is a middle path where the Ahlul-Bayt are given their due right, love for them is incumbent upon every Muslim and the scholars of Islam from Bukhari to the smallest Muhaddith have filled their books with chapters of the merits of the Ahlul-Bayt.

Continue reading Omid Safi – The esoteric (batini) Shia-Sufi Insults Sunnis!

Sunni-Salafi Scholarship And The Condemnation of The Heresies Of The Nawasib and Rawafid On ‘Ashura

In the name of Allah, all praise is due to Allah and may the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon His final Messenger Muhammad al-Mustafa, his family and Companions, especially the Rightly Guided Caliphs, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, ‘Umar al-Faruq, ‘Uthman Dhu al-Nurayn and ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, Assadullah al-Ghalib.

Celebrating that day is an innovation (bid’ah), and making it an anniversary for mourning is an innovation. 

By Ebn Hussein

Sunni-Salafi scholars have always condemned extremism (tatarruf) and exaggeration (ghuluww) that heretical sects have perpetuated, innovated and propagated in the name of (or in opposition of) the Ahlul-Bayt, peace be upon them. By pondering over the statements presented in this treatise, the non-biased reader will clearly realise that Sunnis (Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah) are the middle path between two extremes; namely the extremism of Rafidism (Imamite Shi’ism) and that of Nasibism (the Nasibah or Nawasib i.e. those who embrace the hate of Ali (r) and his family as part of their faith).

Continue reading Sunni-Salafi Scholarship And The Condemnation of The Heresies Of The Nawasib and Rawafid On ‘Ashura

Behind The Anti-American Rhetoric of Iran And The Shia Clergy

Parading corrupt and secular leaders and kings in the Muslim/Sunni world as representatives of Sunnism is as objective as parading the secular former Shah of Iran as a beacon of Shi’ism.

What is definitely hypocritical is if one were to claim to be the flag bearer of Islam and Muslims whilst at the same time allying himself with the worst enemies of Islam against the Muslims (or at the very least preferring the Kuffar over Ahlus-Sunnah).

Continue reading Behind The Anti-American Rhetoric of Iran And The Shia Clergy

The Lavish and Extravagant Shrines and Mausoleums That Must Be Razed To The Ground

Visit to Khomeini’s grave:

  Of course, during my stay in Iran I was also eager to visit the infamous Khomeini shrine (which even then resembled a Sassanian Zoroastrian palace rather than the modest grave of an alleged ascetic Muslim and leader of the oppressed).

Continue reading The Lavish and Extravagant Shrines and Mausoleums That Must Be Razed To The Ground

Shia Iran Has Produced More Apostates and Anti-Islam Activists Than Any Other Muslim Nation

That’s a fact and not up to debate. Yes, every Muslim nation has its rotten fruits/ apostates, however, the champion (when it comes to apostasy and anti-Islam sentiments) is undoubtly ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶I̶s̶l̶a̶m̶i̶c̶ ̶R̶e̶p̶u̶b̶l̶i̶c̶ ̶o̶f̶ Shia Iran. Three Ex-Muslim councils in three major European countries alone are founded by Shia born Iranian.

Salavat!

d

Continue reading Shia Iran Has Produced More Apostates and Anti-Islam Activists Than Any Other Muslim Nation

Never Forget Their Crimes – Aleppo 2016

Left: Zionist military leader Mosha Dayan in occupied Jerusalem 1976 Right: Qasem Soleimani in Aleppo 2016. History repeated itself on that day. The principle enemies of Islam, the Neo-Sasanian Majus (under the guise of Shi’ism) have shown once again their true face.

The then backbone of dictator Bashar Assad, Qasem Soleimani spotted in Aleppo. This #ShiaTerrorist mobilised thousands of foreign Shia fighters.

Continue reading Never Forget Their Crimes – Aleppo 2016

السلسلة: #إنهم_مجوس – حقيقة الرافضة الإمامية الوثنية

تقول رواية منسوبة لصادق ع: «ما بقي بيننا وبين العرب إلا الذبح وأومأ بيده
إلى حلقه» بحار الأنوار 52/349غيبة النعماني: 155 باب 13 #المهدي

Continue reading السلسلة: #إنهم_مجوس – حقيقة الرافضة الإمامية الوثنية

The Rafidi Shia Bid’ah of Prostrating on Clay Tablets

Yes, sometimes falsehood does deserve mocking, however, mocking alone will bring no good, at the very least it must be accompanied by knowledge.

The Rafidi practice of praying on the dirt/soil of the grave (!) of al-Husayn (r) in Karbala is nothing but a ugly Bid’ah that was concocted by extremists in the name of the Ahlul-Bayt that has been academically refuted for the falsehood that it is.

Continue reading The Rafidi Shia Bid’ah of Prostrating on Clay Tablets

Ayatullats = The Culprits Behind The Persianisation of The Ahlul-Bayt

Persianised and whitewashed depections (often strangely effaminate) of the Ahlul-Bayt are widespread in Shia regions of Iran and Iraq and elswhere for a reason. It is not just some ‘cultural practice’ that is shunned by Shia scholars, on the contrary,  the Shia scholars have sanctified Catholic-esque iconography and saint depiction with their lax views regarding the depiction of human beings, particularly saints.

Continue reading Ayatullats = The Culprits Behind The Persianisation of The Ahlul-Bayt

The Turban of The Prophet/Ahlul-Bayt/Sahaba VS The ‘Turban of The Rafidah

The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم)

– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear Turbans in different colours (including Black, White and yellow). He never restricted himself to one colour as the Ahlul-Bid’ah and Zandaqa do (with the Rafidah being the worst of all, as they have turned it into a clerical-tyoe attire like in the Catholic Church where only clergymen wear certain clothing!)

– Although the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) did wear clothes in different colours (including Turbans) his favourite colour and what he commonly wore and advised others to wear was white:

Ibn ‘Abbas (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) said: “Wear white clothes as they are from the best of your clothes, and enshroud your dead in them.” [Abu Dawood, At-Tirmithi and Ibn Majah]

– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear his turban with at least one tail, often two. Yes, there are incidents when he wore a Turban without its tale but these were rare and mainly during warfare.

The Rafidah:

– They have innovated an ugly Hindu-Caste system like Bid’ah of designating certain colours (and cleft attire!) for certain groups only:

So called ‘Sayyids’ (descendants of the Prophet, many of them are non-Arabs to the bilones with no family tree and often despise the Arabs), their laymen, can wear large green shawls (like the followers of Dajjal who will emerge from the heart of modern day Majoosi Iran), green kufis or black ones, the non-Sayyids are not supposed to wear religious attire in green or black!

As for their clergy:

Black is designated for “Sayyids” only whereas white is for non-Sayyids. This despicable Bid’ah itself is less than 500 years old and appeared after the rise of the Safavid Empire (that enforced Twelver Shi’ism on most Iranians). Imagine, even the heretical Pre-Safavid Rawafid didn’t fall into this Church-Hierarchy-style Bid’ah!

– The Rafida wear their turbans like Sikhs do i.e. without tales, yes some of their scholars do let the tale of their turban hang during prayers only but this itself is a Bid’ah (to restrict it to Salah only) and it doesn’t change the fact that the default style of theirs is to wear without letting the tale hang (like Sikh Mushriks).