Category Archives: Aqidah, Usul & Manhaj

The Hadith of Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman Destroys The Very Foundation of Imamism (Shi’ism)

‘Who is the Imam of your time’ the Rafidah always ask Sunnis in discussions regarding Imamah. ‘Whoever died without an Imam he dies a death of jahilyyah’ they always quote (here>>> a thorough refutation of this and similar report) Now one thing is for sure, our Imam certainly isn’t some mythical ‘Mahdi’ who last time was seen in the Sirdab (basement/cellar) of Samarra (100% Sunni city) in Iraq and who is guiding nobody and nothing due to his so-called occultation.

Continue reading The Hadith of Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman Destroys The Very Foundation of Imamism (Shi’ism)

Sunni-Salafi Scholarship And The Condemnation of The Heresies Of The Nawasib and Rawafid On ‘Ashura

In the name of Allah, all praise is due to Allah and may the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon His final Messenger Muhammad al-Mustafa, his family and Companions, especially the Rightly Guided Caliphs, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, ‘Umar al-Faruq, ‘Uthman Dhu al-Nurayn and ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib, Assadullah al-Ghalib.

Celebrating that day is an innovation (bid’ah), and making it an anniversary for mourning is an innovation. 

By Ebn Hussein

Sunni-Salafi scholars have always condemned extremism (tatarruf) and exaggeration (ghuluww) that heretical sects have perpetuated, innovated and propagated in the name of (or in opposition of) the Ahlul-Bayt, peace be upon them. By pondering over the statements presented in this treatise, the non-biased reader will clearly realise that Sunnis (Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah) are the middle path between two extremes; namely the extremism of Rafidism (Imamite Shi’ism) and that of Nasibism (the Nasibah or Nawasib i.e. those who embrace the hate of Ali (r) and his family as part of their faith).

Continue reading Sunni-Salafi Scholarship And The Condemnation of The Heresies Of The Nawasib and Rawafid On ‘Ashura

Many Lies Can Be Found In Three

The scholars say: أن الكذب يكثر في ثلاثة : التاريخ والمغازي والسير

Many lies (weak and fabricated narrations) can be found in three: History books, writings about early Islamic military campaigns and Prophetic biographies.

Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Athar do not pick and choose from books of history, neither what is for nor against them, in fact they have been the most just and narrated many narrations that speak about the mistakes of some Sahaba. Ahlus-Sunnah haven’t watered down the truth let alone hid it, however, Ahlul-Bid’ah have taken advantage of everything that has been reported in books of history as if they are primary Sunni sources! This is why scholars have scrutinised books of history like the Tarikh of Imam al-Tabari to identify blatant fabrications from authentic reports.

Continue reading Many Lies Can Be Found In Three

The Lavish and Extravagant Shrines and Mausoleums That Must Be Razed To The Ground

Visit to Khomeini’s grave:

  Of course, during my stay in Iran I was also eager to visit the infamous Khomeini shrine (which even then resembled a Sassanian Zoroastrian palace rather than the modest grave of an alleged ascetic Muslim and leader of the oppressed).

Continue reading The Lavish and Extravagant Shrines and Mausoleums That Must Be Razed To The Ground

Ali b. Abi Talib Is Upon The Same Creed As The Rest of The Sahabah

Fact: Most Sahaba did NOT participate in the fitan and civil wars after the Prophet’s (s) demise, and even those who did were upon the same creed as Ali ibn Abi Talib (r) for the simple fact that (unlike Rafidi propaganda) the battles of Jamal and Siffin were not disputes about religion, rather they were political disputes (revenge for Othman etc.).

Continue reading Ali b. Abi Talib Is Upon The Same Creed As The Rest of The Sahabah

Two Books about Sunnism In Iran & The Salafi-Athari Creed

Introduction to two books:

1. إيران السنية – الحياة الدينية في إيران قبل الصفوية

‘Sunni Iran – Religious life in Iran before the Safvid era.’ Title says it all. One thing is for sure, the Masajid called to 5 Adhans a day and the scholars knew Tajwid, unlike the ‘Ayatollahs’ of Qom, Najaf, and Karbala.

Continue reading Two Books about Sunnism In Iran & The Salafi-Athari Creed

Imam Sakhtiyani and Shaykh al-Shithri Remarks On New Muslims

البدعةَ لا تنمو وتنتشرُ إلاَّ في ظلِّ الجهلِ ، وغيبةِ أهل العلمِ والإيمان، ولذلكَ قالَ الإمامُ أيوب السختياني ت131~: (من سعادة الحدَث والأعجمي أن يُوفِّقهما الله للعالِم من أهل السنة.

Shaykh Abdurrahman bin Sa’ad bin ‘Ali Al-Shithri:

‘Reprehensible innovations in the religion do not spread but in the shadow of darkness and the absence of the people of knowledge and belief (i.e. scholars), that is why Imam Ayyub Al-al Sakhtiyani said,

“From the happiness of the newly entered person in Islam and the non-Arab is if Allah has given them the success to connect with a scholar of Ahlul-Sunnah.”‘

Source: عَقَائِدُ الشِّيعَةِ الاثنَيْ عَشْرِيَّة سُؤالٌ وجوابٌ لفضية الشيخ عبدالرحمن بن سعد بن علي الشثري

Islam Against Extremism

Despising any theological belief is our human right but remember the statement of the our beloved Prophet (s) narrated by his family:

إياكم والغلو في الدين

Extremism in religion can lead to kufr & Shirk (Rafidism) & indiscriminate slaughter of others (Daesh, Shia death Squads, Iranian Shia militias etc.)

عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِيَّاكُمْ وَالْغُلُوَّ فِي الدِّينِ فَإِنَّهُ أَهْلَكَ مَنْ كَانَ قَبْلَكُمْ الْغُلُوُّ فِي الدِّينِ

3029 سنن ابن ماجه كتاب المناسك باب قدر حصى الرمي

1/327 المحدث ابن تيمية خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح على شرط مسلم في اقتضاء الصراط المستقيم

Ibn Abbas reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “O people, beware of extremism (Ghuluww) in religion for those who came before you were only destroyed because of extremism in religion.”

Source: Sunan ibn Majah 3029

Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Ibn Taymiyyah

NOTHING Resembles Him!

A zindiq with the turban of Satan said:

The Salafi punchline is: ‘in a manner that befits His Majesty’

The punchline actually is:

لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ

{There is nothing like Him, and He is the All‑Hearer, the All‑Seer}

It’s a rabbani and consistent principle that Ahlus-Sunnah employs, an approach in line with revelation. From the verse above we learn from al-Bari, Allah, Himself that we shouldn’t shy away from affirming his attributes (no matter what attributes), however we preceed it with the Quranic principle that nothing is like Him. This is a sound and reasonable principle and as the scholars say:

‘Whatever you imagine in your mind, Allah is different from it.’

Nothing is like Him, hence there is neither an idol hanging in the places of the Ahlul-Sunnah nor an idol in their minds. The Ahlul-Bid’ah like the Rafidah on the other hand have made idols of their buried deities, they pray to them (with the pathetic excuse/misuse of tawassul, just like Christians and other pagans do) i.e. worship them, thus their buried demigods having an actual shape makes them mujassimah and musshabbihah.

Adalat al-Sahaba

To the shallow minded and the zanadiqah of course (who don’t understand what Adalat al-Sahaba means, even if they think they do by having read some basic books on this concept) the following hadith would somehow discredits all Sahaba or at the very least casts a shadow on most of them and make them an untrustworthy entity by default (as its the case in Rafidism, where the Asl/default is that the Sahaba are evil until proven otherwise i.e. certain individuals).

Continue reading Adalat al-Sahaba

The Grave Worshippers are The Real Mushabbihah

القبوريون هم المشبهة

والرافصة المشركون على نهجم (الأشاعرة القبوريين)، يشغلون البسطاء والجهلة بمسألة التجسيم عن التشبيه الحقيقي الذي تحدث عنه القرءان وحذر منه. وهذا الذي يحذر منه القرءان هم فيه واقعون وإليه ويدعون ولواءه يرفعون وهو دعاء غير الله.

They busy the gullible and weak-minded with the issue of tashbih (likening Allah to the Creation) and tajsim (anthropomorphism); the old but modified arguments of the Jahmiyyah, accusations levelled against Ahlus-Sunnah that can be refuted by the Qur’an alone (that adding to the Jahmiyyah contains Kufr in its Dhahir!), let alone the reports of the Salaf al-Salihin.

The truth is: It is the qubooris have fallen into the clear-cut tashbih: Calling on other than Allah (under the guise of ‘tawasul’).

The Turban of The Prophet/Ahlul-Bayt/Sahaba VS The ‘Turban of The Rafidah

The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم)

– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear Turbans in different colours (including Black, White and yellow). He never restricted himself to one colour as the Ahlul-Bid’ah and Zandaqa do (with the Rafidah being the worst of all, as they have turned it into a clerical-tyoe attire like in the Catholic Church where only clergymen wear certain clothing!)

– Although the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) did wear clothes in different colours (including Turbans) his favourite colour and what he commonly wore and advised others to wear was white:

Ibn ‘Abbas (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) said: “Wear white clothes as they are from the best of your clothes, and enshroud your dead in them.” [Abu Dawood, At-Tirmithi and Ibn Majah]

– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear his turban with at least one tail, often two. Yes, there are incidents when he wore a Turban without its tale but these were rare and mainly during warfare.

The Rafidah:

– They have innovated an ugly Hindu-Caste system like Bid’ah of designating certain colours (and cleft attire!) for certain groups only:

So called ‘Sayyids’ (descendants of the Prophet, many of them are non-Arabs to the bilones with no family tree and often despise the Arabs), their laymen, can wear large green shawls (like the followers of Dajjal who will emerge from the heart of modern day Majoosi Iran), green kufis or black ones, the non-Sayyids are not supposed to wear religious attire in green or black!

As for their clergy:

Black is designated for “Sayyids” only whereas white is for non-Sayyids. This despicable Bid’ah itself is less than 500 years old and appeared after the rise of the Safavid Empire (that enforced Twelver Shi’ism on most Iranians). Imagine, even the heretical Pre-Safavid Rawafid didn’t fall into this Church-Hierarchy-style Bid’ah!

– The Rafida wear their turbans like Sikhs do i.e. without tales, yes some of their scholars do let the tale of their turban hang during prayers only but this itself is a Bid’ah (to restrict it to Salah only) and it doesn’t change the fact that the default style of theirs is to wear without letting the tale hang (like Sikh Mushriks).

May Allah Protect Saudi Arabia

May Allah protect Saudi Arabia and its people.

Those who know me, know that I’m anything but a Saudi apologist, far from it. As matt of fact I’m an open critic, a very harsh one. However, I don’t make Takfir on the rulers in Saudi and believe that whoever forces (religious blackmailing with superficial Istidlalat as if it’s a clear cut matter with zero hhubuhat involved) others to do so is a complete nutcase.

If Saudi falls there will be nothing but chaos, havoc and likely a civil war. Worse, the Rafidah, with the head of the snake and Shaytan being Neo-Safawi Iran, will most likely take over. No matter how much one disagrees with the Saudis, one shouldn’t get blinded by ones opposition to them, for the principle enemy of Ahlus-Sunnah has his eyes on the true Haramayn (Makkah and Madinah) which it wants to turn into carnivalistic places of self-flagellation, mud bathing, grave worship, tomb crawling and other Persian Rafidi Majoosi paganism in the name of Ahlul-Bayt.

This doesn’t mean that we don’t speak against injustice, this means that we don’t let our lands fall into the hands of the Majus of Qom and Tehran. We don’t take a defeatist approach but we also not gonna act hastly and make things worse.

Shab al-Amrad (Hairless Boy) shubha Debunked

Do Sunnis/Salafis believe that God sits cross legged and is a beardless young man wearing a green robe?

Both of these pathetic Shubuhāt are often brought up by hardcore Qubūrīs (grave worshippers) from amongst the esoteric/batini Sufiyyah and their spiritual cousins, the Rafidah.

The likes of Zindīq Syed (‘Sayed’) Ali (Imam) from Bayat al-Ganesh (‘Ghadeer’) have often brought up this misleading doubt (in order to distract from the bizarre and blatantly pagan beliefs and rituals of their religion), copying and pasting the nonsense from the likes of Zindiq Hassan Farhan al-Maliki (crypto-Rafidi in Saudi Arabia), Saqqaf and other zanadiqah.

Enjoy watching the brothers in Sudān dismantling this shubha, academically and thoroughly without any apologetic excuses.

Ibn Taymiyyah Was A True ‘Sufi’

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (who criticised and refuted the Ghulāt Sūfiyyah whilst defending SHAR’ī Tasawwuf) balanced words on Tasawwuf.

He literally says that amongst the greatest Awliya` of Allah are those who were called Sufis.

والتحقيق أن فيه الممدوح والمذموم ـ يعني في مذهب التصوف الممدوح والمذموم ـ والمذموم منه ما يكون اجتهادياً ومنه غير ذلك، كفقه الرأي فإنه قد ذم فقه الرأي طوائف من الفقهاء والعلماء والعباد ” . ثم يقول : ” ومـن المتسمين بهذا الاسم ـ أي التصوف ـ من أولياء الله وصفوته وخيار عباده ما لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله، كما أن من أهل الرأي ـ أي من فقهاء الرأي ـ أهل العلم والإيمان طوائف لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله ” .

The Salaf Preferred The Term Zuhd Over The Obscure Terminology of Tasawwuf

The Salaf preferred the term Zuhd instead of Tasawwuf (which has a disputed origin), however, none of them rejected the Shar’ī intended meaning and Maqāsid of it as they are and inherent part of Sunni creed.

The scholars say:

التصوف الصحيح بني على الزهد، والزهد أصل من أصول الشريعة

‘Correct and authentic Tasawwuf is based on Zuhd (Islamic ascetism) and Zuhd is a branch of the branches of the Shari’ah.’

The early Salaf used the term ‘Zuhd’ instead of Tasawwuf, the likes of ‘Abdullah Ibn al-Mubarak al-Turkumāni (181 AH, Hannad ibn al-Sari (152 AH), Imam Ahmad, etc.

The Reality VS The Name of a Matter

The Muslim, Sunni, is just, he is moderate by nature and rejects all forms of extremism.

One of the Usūl and principles the scholars mention is:

أن العبرة في الحكم على الأشياء بالمسميات لا بالأسماء

‘The criterion for judging matters is based on their reality and not on what they are called.’

So whereas every Sunni is judged as a Muslim and non-Mubtadi’ (until proven otherwise) and every Shi’ī as a Mubtadi’, yet the opposite can be true i.e. the Dhāhir is just an indicator that can be proven wrong with the actual reality of a thing or someone’s (beliefs).

Having said that:

The one who calls himself Shi’ī, including a Twelver who doesn’t hold Kufrī beliefs and doesn’t pray to Imāms (although extremely rare) = Muslim brother in faith, however, Mubtadi’.

The ‘Sunnī’ who prays like Pīr Baba X, Y, Z and hold other Kufrī and Shirkī beliefs = Pagan Mushrik.

It’s not about Sunni or Shia and name calling, it’s about the reality of matters, it’s about Tawhīd and Shirk. So don’t be fooled by labels.

Affirming Sifat = Nah Giving divine Sifat To the Creation = Yeah!

Quburi Sifat rejecters and deniers of the Jahmite kind have no issues with buried Imams, saints and pirs in their graves listening (and ming to aid) of millions upon millions of people and their duas like as if they are connected to a personal hotline with them (a 24/h one, 7 days weeks a day, as if their saints don’t sleep).

They have no issue that divine attributes, including those that are specific to Allah are attributed to the creation, but they have issues with Ahlul-Sunnah wa al-Athar affirming the Sifat in the Qur’an such as Hands, Face etc.

They have an issue with Allah speaking directly to Musa (a)!

#Tajsim #Tajseem #Jahmi #Nonsense