A Shia Priest with effaminate hand gestures:
A Shia Priest with effaminate hand gestures:
القبوريون هم المشبهة
والرافصة المشركون على نهجم (الأشاعرة القبوريين)، يشغلون البسطاء والجهلة بمسألة التجسيم عن التشبيه الحقيقي الذي تحدث عنه القرءان وحذر منه. وهذا الذي يحذر منه القرءان هم فيه واقعون وإليه ويدعون ولواءه يرفعون وهو دعاء غير الله.
They busy the gullible and weak-minded with the issue of tashbih (likening Allah to the Creation) and tajsim (anthropomorphism); the old but modified arguments of the Jahmiyyah, accusations levelled against Ahlus-Sunnah that can be refuted by the Qur’an alone (that adding to the Jahmiyyah contains Kufr in its Dhahir!), let alone the reports of the Salaf al-Salihin.
The truth is: It is the qubooris have fallen into the clear-cut tashbih: Calling on other than Allah (under the guise of ‘tawasul’).
The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم)
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear Turbans in different colours (including Black, White and yellow). He never restricted himself to one colour as the Ahlul-Bid’ah and Zandaqa do (with the Rafidah being the worst of all, as they have turned it into a clerical-tyoe attire like in the Catholic Church where only clergymen wear certain clothing!)
– Although the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) did wear clothes in different colours (including Turbans) his favourite colour and what he commonly wore and advised others to wear was white:
Ibn ‘Abbas (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) said: “Wear white clothes as they are from the best of your clothes, and enshroud your dead in them.” [Abu Dawood, At-Tirmithi and Ibn Majah]
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear his turban with at least one tail, often two. Yes, there are incidents when he wore a Turban without its tale but these were rare and mainly during warfare.
– They have innovated an ugly Hindu-Caste system like Bid’ah of designating certain colours (and cleft attire!) for certain groups only:
So called ‘Sayyids’ (descendants of the Prophet, many of them are non-Arabs to the bilones with no family tree and often despise the Arabs), their laymen, can wear large green shawls (like the followers of Dajjal who will emerge from the heart of modern day Majoosi Iran), green kufis or black ones, the non-Sayyids are not supposed to wear religious attire in green or black!
As for their clergy:
Black is designated for “Sayyids” only whereas white is for non-Sayyids. This despicable Bid’ah itself is less than 500 years old and appeared after the rise of the Safavid Empire (that enforced Twelver Shi’ism on most Iranians). Imagine, even the heretical Pre-Safavid Rawafid didn’t fall into this Church-Hierarchy-style Bid’ah!
– The Rafida wear their turbans like Sikhs do i.e. without tales, yes some of their scholars do let the tale of their turban hang during prayers only but this itself is a Bid’ah (to restrict it to Salah only) and it doesn’t change the fact that the default style of theirs is to wear without letting the tale hang (like Sikh Mushriks).
May Allah protect Saudi Arabia and its people.
Those who know me, know that I’m anything but a Saudi apologist, far from it. As matt of fact I’m an open critic, a very harsh one. However, I don’t make Takfir on the rulers in Saudi and believe that whoever forces (religious blackmailing with superficial Istidlalat as if it’s a clear cut matter with zero hhubuhat involved) others to do so is a complete nutcase.
If Saudi falls there will be nothing but chaos, havoc and likely a civil war. Worse, the Rafidah, with the head of the snake and Shaytan being Neo-Safawi Iran, will most likely take over. No matter how much one disagrees with the Saudis, one shouldn’t get blinded by ones opposition to them, for the principle enemy of Ahlus-Sunnah has his eyes on the true Haramayn (Makkah and Madinah) which it wants to turn into carnivalistic places of self-flagellation, mud bathing, grave worship, tomb crawling and other Persian Rafidi Majoosi paganism in the name of Ahlul-Bayt.
This doesn’t mean that we don’t speak against injustice, this means that we don’t let our lands fall into the hands of the Majus of Qom and Tehran. We don’t take a defeatist approach but we also not gonna act hastly and make things worse.
Do Sunnis/Salafis believe that God sits cross legged and is a beardless young man wearing a green robe?
Both of these pathetic Shubuhāt are often brought up by hardcore Qubūrīs (grave worshippers) from amongst the esoteric/batini Sufiyyah and their spiritual cousins, the Rafidah.
The likes of Zindīq Syed (‘Sayed’) Ali (Imam) from Bayat al-Ganesh (‘Ghadeer’) have often brought up this misleading doubt (in order to distract from the bizarre and blatantly pagan beliefs and rituals of their religion), copying and pasting the nonsense from the likes of Zindiq Hassan Farhan al-Maliki (crypto-Rafidi in Saudi Arabia), Saqqaf and other zanadiqah.
Enjoy watching the brothers in Sudān dismantling this shubha, academically and thoroughly without any apologetic excuses.
Qubūri Shubuhāt (doubts, misleading arguments) – Weaker Than a Spider Web – #CallingOtherThanAllah
Anybody who calls upon saints from afar believes by NECASSITY that his buried saints can hear, see etc everything. This person has knowingly or unknowingly deified his saints.
Every true Sunni is a ‘Sufi’ and every true ‘Sufi’ is a Sunni. Only simpleton ‘Salafis’ reject Tasawwuf in its entirety.
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (who criticised and refuted the Ghulāt Sūfiyyah whilst defending SHAR’ī Tasawwuf) balanced words on Tasawwuf.
He literally says that amongst the greatest Awliya` of Allah are those who were called Sufis.
والتحقيق أن فيه الممدوح والمذموم ـ يعني في مذهب التصوف الممدوح والمذموم ـ والمذموم منه ما يكون اجتهادياً ومنه غير ذلك، كفقه الرأي فإنه قد ذم فقه الرأي طوائف من الفقهاء والعلماء والعباد ” . ثم يقول : ” ومـن المتسمين بهذا الاسم ـ أي التصوف ـ من أولياء الله وصفوته وخيار عباده ما لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله، كما أن من أهل الرأي ـ أي من فقهاء الرأي ـ أهل العلم والإيمان طوائف لا يعلم عددهم إلا الله ” .
The Salaf preferred the term Zuhd instead of Tasawwuf (which has a disputed origin), however, none of them rejected the Shar’ī intended meaning and Maqāsid of it as they are and inherent part of Sunni creed.
The scholars say:
‘Correct and authentic Tasawwuf is based on Zuhd (Islamic ascetism) and Zuhd is a branch of the branches of the Shari’ah.’
The early Salaf used the term ‘Zuhd’ instead of Tasawwuf, the likes of ‘Abdullah Ibn al-Mubarak al-Turkumāni (181 AH, Hannad ibn al-Sari (152 AH), Imam Ahmad, etc.
The Muslim, Sunni, is just, he is moderate by nature and rejects all forms of extremism.
One of the Usūl and principles the scholars mention is:
أن العبرة في الحكم على الأشياء بالمسميات لا بالأسماء
‘The criterion for judging matters is based on their reality and not on what they are called.’
So whereas every Sunni is judged as a Muslim and non-Mubtadi’ (until proven otherwise) and every Shi’ī as a Mubtadi’, yet the opposite can be true i.e. the Dhāhir is just an indicator that can be proven wrong with the actual reality of a thing or someone’s (beliefs).
Having said that:
The one who calls himself Shi’ī, including a Twelver who doesn’t hold Kufrī beliefs and doesn’t pray to Imāms (although extremely rare) = Muslim brother in faith, however, Mubtadi’.
The ‘Sunnī’ who prays like Pīr Baba X, Y, Z and hold other Kufrī and Shirkī beliefs = Pagan Mushrik.
It’s not about Sunni or Shia and name calling, it’s about the reality of matters, it’s about Tawhīd and Shirk. So don’t be fooled by labels.
Quburi Sifat rejecters and deniers of the Jahmite kind have no issues with buried Imams, saints and pirs in their graves listening (and ming to aid) of millions upon millions of people and their duas like as if they are connected to a personal hotline with them (a 24/h one, 7 days weeks a day, as if their saints don’t sleep).
They have no issue that divine attributes, including those that are specific to Allah are attributed to the creation, but they have issues with Ahlul-Sunnah wa al-Athar affirming the Sifat in the Qur’an such as Hands, Face etc.
They have an issue with Allah speaking directly to Musa (a)!
#Tajsim #Tajseem #Jahmi #Nonsense
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
‘Prostration is of two types: prostration by way of pure worship, and prostration by way of honouring and greeting showing respect. As for the former, it can only be done for Allah.’
[Majmu‘ al-Fatawa (4/361)]
It’s a dog eat dog was world, it always has been.
لا إله إلا الله
‘There is no deity worthy of worship in truth except God/Allāh’ is undoubtly superior and the only truth, the only right Dīn is Islām
ولو كره المشركون
Zindiq: I’m Allah!
Sufi: MashaAllah, how elegant! There is a context to this statement you shallow minded Wahabi simpleton.
Sunni-Athari: Allah is above his ‘Arsh, bila kayf.
Sufi: A’oooooozoooobir-Rasul! Ya Ghawth al-A’dham (NOT Allah nor his Mesenger)/Ya Sidi Abdal-Qadir+Ya Ali+Ya Badawi madaaaad!
You Mujassim! Allah exist without place and time, blah blah blah blah blah…takfir takfir!
The people of the Sunnah are the saved and victorious sect; they are balanced, a middle path between the Khawarij/Nawasib and Rawafid heretics. Both are extremists, one group due to their hatred of our master ‘Ali (ra) the other for their Ghuluww (excessiveness) regarding him.