To the shallow minded and the zanadiqah of course (who don’t understand what Adalat al-Sahaba means, even if they think they do by having read some basic books on this concept) the following hadith would somehow discredits all Sahaba or at the very least casts a shadow on most of them and make them an untrustworthy entity by default (as its the case in Rafidism, where the Asl/default is that the Sahaba are evil until proven otherwise i.e. certain individuals).
Thawban reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The Hour will not be established until tribes from my nation join the idolaters and they worship idols. Verily, there will be thirty liars among my nation, all of them claiming to be a prophet, but I am the seal of the prophets. There is no prophet after me.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2219
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Tirmidhi
عَنْ ثَوْبَانَ قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ لَا تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى تَلْحَقَ قَبَائِلُ مِنْ أُمَّتِي بِالْمُشْرِكِينَ وَحَتَّى يَعْبُدُوا الْأَوْثَانَ وَإِنَّهُ سَيَكُونُ فِي أُمَّتِي ثَلَاثُونَ كَذَّابُونَ كُلُّهُمْ يَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ نَبِيٌّ وَأَنَا خَاتَمُ النَّبِيِّينَ لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي
2219 سنن الترمذي كتاب الفتن باب ما جاء لا تقوم الساعة حتى يخرج كذابون
قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ
Hassan Al-Qadri has (admittedly) a big mouth, lots of drama and hot air, but when it comes to action he is the master of avoiding those who can dismantle him and the best arguments of his Rāfidi religion.
By Dawud Walid
Back then 25 years young, March 2009, somewhere near Green Street, East LND. My debut vid on YouTube with my friend and Shaykh, Abū Muntasir al-Balūshī (Ahlus-Sunnah Irān).
Full clip: https://youtu.be/yT0Banv3LwY
A Shia Priest with effaminate hand gestures:
القبوريون هم المشبهة
والرافصة المشركون على نهجم (الأشاعرة القبوريين)، يشغلون البسطاء والجهلة بمسألة التجسيم عن التشبيه الحقيقي الذي تحدث عنه القرءان وحذر منه. وهذا الذي يحذر منه القرءان هم فيه واقعون وإليه ويدعون ولواءه يرفعون وهو دعاء غير الله.
They busy the gullible and weak minded with the issue of Tashbih (likening Allah to the Creation) and Tajsim (anthropomorphism); the old but modified arguments of the Jahmiyyah, accusations levelled against Ahlus-Sunnah that can be refuted by the Qur’an alone (that adding to the Jahmiyyah contains Kufr in its Dhahir!), let alone the reports of the Salaf al-Salihin.
The truth is: It is the Qubūrīs who have fallen into the clear-cut Tashbih: Calling on other than Allah (under the guise of ‘Tawasul’).
The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم)
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear Turbans in different colours (including Black, White and yellow). He never restricted himself to one colour as the Ahlul-Bid’ah and Zandaqa do (with the Rafidah being the worst of all, as they have turned it into a clerical-tyoe attire like in the Catholic Church where only clergymen wear certain clothing!)
– Although the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) did wear clothes in different colours (including Turbans) his favourite colour and what he commonly wore and advised others to wear was white:
Ibn ‘Abbas (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) said: “Wear white clothes as they are from the best of your clothes, and enshroud your dead in them.” [Abu Dawood, At-Tirmithi and Ibn Majah]
– The Prophet (صل الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم) used to wear his turban with at least one tail, often two. Yes, there are incidents when he wore a Turban without its tale but these were rare and mainly during warfare.
– They have innovated an ugly Hindu-Caste system like Bid’ah of designating certain colours (and cleft attire!) for certain groups only:
So called ‘Sayyids’ (descendants of the Prophet, many of them are non-Arabs to the bilones with no family tree and often despise the Arabs), their laymen, can wear large green shawls (like the followers of Dajjal who will emerge from the heart of modern day Majoosi Iran), green kufis or black ones, the non-Sayyids are not supposed to wear religious attire in green or black!
As for their clergy:
Black is designated for “Sayyids” only whereas white is for non-Sayyids. This despicable Bid’ah itself is less than 500 years old and appeared after the rise of the Safavid Empire (that enforced Twelver Shi’ism on most Iranians). Imagine, even the heretical Pre-Safavid Rawafid didn’t fall into this Church-Hierarchy-style Bid’ah!
– The Rafida wear their turbans like Sikhs do i.e. without tales, yes some of their scholars do let the tale of their turban hang during prayers only but this itself is a Bid’ah (to restrict it to Salah only) and it doesn’t change the fact that the default style of theirs is to wear without letting the tale hang (like Sikh Mushriks).
Yasser Qadhi and his Rafidi friends: Daesh Terrorist Group were inspired by the Najdi Dawah.
The Prophet and his Sahaba (includes Ahlul-Bayt) did not wage Jihad against the Mushrikun in order to replace ‘Ya Hubal, Ya Lāt, Ya Jesus, Ya Mary madad’ (help) with his family (‘Ya Ali, Ya Fatimah, Ya dozen Imams madad’) and a whole plethora of Sufi pirs and other saints.
If you are high on this Shirk you might as well join the Catholic or Orthodox Church (avoid protestants as they would make Takfir on the aforementioned AND you), they have a saint for every specific task (like the Rafidah) and you’ll do just fine.
A fabricated narration Shias love to use and circulate in defence of Mut’ah (pleasure / temporary marriage):
Do Sunnis/Salafis believe that God sits cross legged and is a beardless young man wearing a green robe?
Both of these pathetic Shubuhāt are often brought up by hardcore Qubūrīs (grave worshippers) from amongst the esoteric/batini Sufiyyah and their spiritual cousins, the Rafidah.
The likes of Zindīq Syed (‘Sayed’) Ali (Imam) from Bayat al-Ganesh (‘Ghadeer’) have often brought up this misleading doubt (in order to distract from the bizarre and blatantly pagan beliefs and rituals of their religion), copying and pasting the nonsense from the likes of Zindiq Hassan Farhan al-Maliki (crypto-Rafidi in Saudi Arabia), Saqqaf and other zanadiqah.
Enjoy watching the brothers in Sudān dismantling this shubha, academically and thoroughly without any apologetic excuses.
Qubūri Shubuhāt (doubts, misleading arguments) – Weaker Than a Spider Web – #CallingOtherThanAllah
Anybody who calls upon saints from afar believes by NECASSITY that his buried saints can hear, see etc everything. This person has knowingly or unknowingly deified his saints.
This is why Mushrikūn call on their buried gods in the first place; they already hold shirki beliefs that they and their Rabbis and priests justify with mental gymnastics, fallicious analogies and other pathetic excuses (such as: “My saint can hear and respond to unlimited calls, but not as many as Allah”…’Allah can create millions of Jesus’ and Ali’s who can aid us…why not? with the persmission of Allah…blah blah…’).
These are simple Lawāzim that come with such practices, and this is why scholars such as Ibn Uthaymin, Nasir al-Barrak etc rightfully excused ONLY those who ask the Prophet (s) right next to his grave to ASK Allah (only for Shafa’ah). This is undoubtly not Shirk as the one doing it has some form of (although incorrect) Shubuhat (Prophets alive in heir graves etc.) AND, most importantly, the doer doesn’t believe that the Prophet can is aware of every call, can hear every call, can respond to every call etc. i.e. he hasn’t deified the Prophet (s) in any shape whatsoever.
PS: Quburiyun denying their Ibada by calling it ‘Tawassul’/’Wasilah’/’Shafa’ah’ or adding their favourite clause of ‘Bi`idhnillah’ to their shirk doesn’t turn their paganism into Tawhid. Matters are judged based on their reality and not what they are called.
CALL UPON YOUR LORD (not Ali, Jesus, Fatimah, Mary Angels, Badawi, Jilani, Pir Baba etc)
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:
‘Prostration is of two types: prostration by way of pure worship, and prostration by way of honouring and greeting showing respect. As for the former, it can only be done for Allah.’
[Majmu‘ al-Fatawa (4/361)]
We SEIZED them unawares, and lo! they were dumbfounded. – Qur’an 6:44
#Iraq #Iran #Khomeinists #Shirazis #TurbansOfIblis
Are names like Abdul-Masih (of Christ), Abdul-Nabiyy (Muhammad), Abdul-Hussain etc. Haram and do they denote and necassiate Kufr and Shirk of the one who carries them?
I remember a Tyre head (I refuse to call that Sikh-looking thing on their heads as a Muslim Turban) a few years ago making a quite blunt and honest confession (you could tell, he knew what is awaiting him and his likes):
Rafidah/Pseudo-Sufis (fake Sufis/esoteric batini heretics):
“Iblis fell into error because he was obsessed with Tawhid and wanted to avoid shirk left and right. Ya Ghous-E-Azam madad, Ya Ali madad!”
Sunni: Iblis actually gave preference to his ‘aql/intellect over the command of Allah, other than that he had undoubtly a better Tawhid understanding than you Mushriks, for even Iblis knew how correct Tawasul (by calling on Allah alone THROUGH his beautiful names and attributes) is done:
عن أبي سعيد الخدري قال سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول إن إبليس قال لربه بعزتك وجلالك لا أبرح أغوي بني آدم ما دامت الأرواح فيهم فقال الله فبعزتي وجلالي لا أبرح أغفر لهم ما استغفروني
From Abu Sa’id al-Khudri (r): I heard the Prophet (s) saying: “The devil said to his Lord: “By your POWER (‘Izz) and MAJESTY (Jalalah), I won’t stop misleading the children of Adam as long as they are alive”. Then Allah said: “By my honour and majesty, and I won’t stop forgiving them as long as they seek for forgiveness from me”. [Ahmad]
الحقيقة: ارتد الناس إلا الصحابة وبعض القبائل العربية.
أسطورة الشيعية التكفيرية:ارتد الناس إلا ثلاثة نفر
The truth: The people all became apostates SAVE for the Sahabah (mainly city dwellers i.e. Makkah, Madinah etc.) and some Arab tribes.
Twelver Shia Imamism myth: “The people all became apostates after the Prophet’s death except…
Asking Ali, Fatimah, Jesus, Mary, Jilani, Badawi, Imam ____ or Pir ____ for help is as Shirk as asking a friend for help. Don’t you go to the doctor asking to get cured? Lulz, that means Vahabis do shirk everyday when asking anyone for help. Lulz, refuted!
Ya Ali+Mahdi+Fatimah+Abolfaaz+Zaynab+Hossein madadz.
A list of Shia terrorist militias, all founded by Iran, based on extremist Shia beliefs, aimed at fighting Sunnis (pretext: fighting Daesh).
No doubt their books teach that every Sunni is a Nasibi. Know that this is why they loot Sunni towns&even kill children, it’s Majoosi grudge
No1 understands their thirst 4 Muslim blood except the 1ns who studied them & their books. Wahabis/Daesh r just excuses 4 them 2 kill Sunnis
An Iranian backed Shia massacre (much worse than what happend on New Zealand) at Sunnis that didn’t cover the news:
In 2014, Iranian backed Shia militants killed at least 73 people in an attack on the Musab bin Omair mosque, during Friday prayer (Iraq).
How many Muslims have been fooled by Iran’s “unity” rethoric of lies?
Note: This is not to undermine the lives lost at the New Zealand attacks (or Shiites lives by terrorists in similar barbaric attacks) in the very slight least. Some will say, ‘this isn’t the time to divide, stop disinviting’.
But the reality is, is there unity with state sponsored terrorist like the Shia militias of Syria, Iraq and Yemen? They have pillaged much much more, they are not just the poor victims as they love to claim and portray themselves.
بسم الله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وأصحابه ومن والاه
Look at this insecure miskin who must be on some next level damage control mode.
You know what this circus reminds me of? Of the following hadith: