Monthly Archives: Nov 2020

Ahlul-Bayt/Sahabah, Tashayyu' / Shi'ism

Ali ibn Abi Talib pledged allegiance willingly and out of conviction

1 Comment

The Twelver Shia sect is based on mass-Takfir of the companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ), particularly the chief of the Muhajirun and Ansar (may Allah be pleased with them). Of course, this extreme and heretical belief stems from the Twelver belief that the Sahaba (companions) usurped the political authority (Khilafah) of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him). That belief in return is justified by half-baked and flimsy pieces of ‘evidence’ (either outright weak and fabricated narrations or decontextualised and misconstrued authentic narrations) that the Shia provide from ‘Sunni sources’ (cherry-picking of the Sunni hadith corpus). Continue reading Ali ibn Abi Talib pledged allegiance willingly and out of conviction →

Aqidah, Usul & Manhaj, Miscellaneous

Everyone claims to have a connection with Layla…

One of my favourite (Arab) proverbs:

وَكُلُّ يَدَّعِي وَصْلاً بِلَيْلَى **** وَلَيْلَى لَا تُقِرُّ لَهُمْ بِذَاكَا
إِذَا اشْتَبَكَتْ دُمُوعٌ فِي جُفُونٍ **** تبينَ مَنْ بَكَى مِمَّنْ تَبَاكَى

Everyone claims to have a connection with Layla, but Layla does not affirm that for any of them…

Shaykh al-Albani (رحمه الله) quoted it often (when referring to claimants of Islam/Sunnah and the truth). It is based on an old story of Arabic origin, about the 7th-century Najdi Bedouin poet Qays ibn al-Mullawah and his lady love Layla bint Mahdi (or Layla al-Aamiriya). “The Layla-Majnun theme passed from Arabic to Persian, Turkish, and Indian languages”, most famously through the narrative poem composed in 584/1188 by the Persian poet Nizami Ganjavi, as the third part of his Khamsa.

Aqidah, Usul & Manhaj, From Imamism to Islam, Shi'ism & Iran, Tashayyu' / Shi'ism

Ex-Shia On The Pros and Cons Of Nahj al-Balagha

Nahj al-Balagha (Arabic: نهج البلاغة) (the Peak of Eloquence) is a collection of sayings and writings attributed to ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضي الله عنه). It is a highly revered Twelver Shia book often referred to by Shia ‘Ayatollahs’ as the brother of the Qur’an (then they have the audacity to claim that Sunnis exaggerate with Sahih Bukhari who nobody dares to compare to the Qur’an).

Continue reading Ex-Shia On The Pros and Cons Of Nahj al-Balagha →

Ahlul-Bayt/Sahabah, Shubuhat Debunked, Tashayyu' / Shi'ism

Who Was Behind The Poisoning Of The Prophet (ﷺ)? – How Shi’ism Whitewashes The Crimes Of The Jews [RAFIDA REFUTED]

In Rafidism (Twelver Shiism) the Jews are whitewashed of the murder of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). Who do the Shia blame instead? None other than his companions/wives of course!

This makes Twelver Shi’ism the only sect out of all deviant sects that lifts the blame from the Jews and shifts it to the Sahaba. In this article, I’ll be dissecting their spurious pieces of evidence one by one with the Help of Allah.

Continue reading Who Was Behind The Poisoning Of The Prophet (ﷺ)? – How Shi’ism Whitewashes The Crimes Of The Jews [RAFIDA REFUTED] →

Ebn Hussein Responds

The Morons At BaG Don’t Know The Difference between ‘Bay’at’ and ‘Bayt’.

Their dumb members literally pronounce it as ‘Bayt Al Ghadeer’ which means ‘the house of Ghadeer’. How much of a buffoon do you have to be that you can’t pronounce your own channel name?

It is Bay’ah (or Bay’at) – بيعة – and not Bayt (house), you utter fools. The following one is also a noteworthy and hilarious observation:

Bayat means Hibernation which is even worse. Bayt means house which is also off. They should’ve stuck to something like Volayat-e-Khana’.

Ahlul-Bayt/Sahabah, Aqidah, Usul & Manhaj, Tashayyu' / Shi'ism

Attacking The Sahabah Serves As A Springboard For Attacking The Qur’an and the Sunnah

One of the most famous quotes by Imam Abu Zur’ah al-Razi (one of the Imams of the Salaf of Persian descent) with regards to the Rafidah Shia:

‘If you see a man belittling anyone from the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) then know that he is a Zindeeq(heretic who claims Islam i.e. Munafiq).  That is because we believe that the Messenger (ﷺ) is true, the Qur’an is true and those who conveyed this Qur’an and the Sunnah to us were the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).  Rather what the heretics want to do is criticise our trustworthy narrators so they can nullify the Book and the Sunnah, they are more deserving of being criticised since they are the Zanaadiqa (heretics).’ (Narrated by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi in Tarikh al-Baghdad)

How true this statement is when one considers common and foolish Rafidi reasonings like the following:

Imam Hussain was killed by Yazid…who was appointed by Mu’awiyah…who was appointed by ‘Uthman (who appointed Muawiyah Governor of Syria)…they stop here, wheras if one were to follow they zindeeqi logic one could go further and say: and the Prophet (ﷺ) befriended the likes of ‘Uthman and honoured him twice by giving ‘Uthman two of his daughters…and the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) was sent by Allah…so let’s blame all of them, wal-‘Ayadhubillah!